When did it ever become acceptable to base an argument on threats of personal physical and sexual violence? It seems the argument must be weak to resort to these tactics.
And when did the law allow such threatening language to occur?
When did it ever become acceptable to base an argument on threats of personal physical and sexual violence? It seems the argument must be weak to resort to these tactics.
And when did the law allow such threatening language to occur?
If you're trying to justify violent threats towards people who don't share your views, particularly those based on your misunderstanding of the transgender issue and a redefinition of free speech, then you have lost the argument. Not to mention respect or credibility. Not surprising if you get shouted at.
When did it ever become acceptable to base an argument on threats of personal physical and sexual violence? It seems the argument must be weak to resort to these tactics.
And when did the law allow such threatening language to occur?
You completely, perhaps intentionally, misunderstand the argument.
If you're trying to justify violent threats towards people who don't share your views, particularly those based on your misunderstanding of the transgender issue and a redefinition of free speech, then you have lost the argument. Not to mention respect or credibility. Not surprising if you get shouted at.