Why the UK parliament is monitoring our fast-track consenting bill

And what it has to do with the environment.

Mōrena, and welcome to The Bulletin for Monday, May 13.

In today’s edition: The aurora lit up our skies over the weekend, TVNZ’s Sunday aired its final show, and how the education system is failing our neurodivergent children. But first, environmental concerns persist over the government’s proposed fast-track bill.

(Image: Getty Images)

Where we’re at with the fast-track consenting bill

A couple of months ago in The Bulletin, Anna Rawhiti-Connell took a look at the government’s fast-track consenting bill and some of the concerns that had been voiced about it. The bill, which would allow a trio of ministers to effectively consent projects themselves, is now before select committee. But the worries about it still remain, as this 1News poll from the start of May illustrated. The government has said it’s open to changes with the proposed law. Before the weekend, infrastructure minister Chris Bishop told an industry conference that the government would consider “sensible changes”. But, he added, “the core of it isn’t changing: a one-stop-shop, so all consents and permits are considered together, and a fast-track – so consents speed up.” That’s the same language Bishop has consistently used to describe the bill.

Policy could take us back to the ‘80s

One of the primary concerns opponents of the bill have put forward is that it places significant power in the hands of a small group of ministers. Chief ombudsman Peter Boshier recently expressed concerns over the “enormous executive powers” the bill could create, as Tom Pullar-Strecker at The Post reported. Then there’s the risk of projects being agreed to without proper scrutiny of the environmental ramifications, one of the reasons a hīkoi of hundreds, led by Ngāti Toa, turned out in front of parliament last week. On TVNZ’s Q&A yesterday morning, lawyer Raewyn Peart, policy director for the Environmental Defence Society, said that the bill harked back to the ‘80s – “when the environment didn’t feature in government decision-making”. And on RNZ this morning, an in-depth look from Farah Hancock at how the fast track bill could allow projects rejected by the courts to get the go ahead from government (at the expense of the environment).

UK government monitoring the bill 

Those environmental concerns have gone around the world and may have deeper ramifications, as Hancock examined in this long read from March. It was reported Forest and Bird were worried that clauses in our free trade deal with the UK could be breached by the bill, as the international agreement requires environmental protections and due process for feedback. Earlier this month, the UK government confirmed it was monitoring the bill’s passage through parliament, as Thomas Manch reported in The Press. You can find the full transcript of the exchange in the UK parliament hansard here, showing a Liberal Democrat MP asking the UK trade minister what the UK government will do to ensure New Zealand upholds its commitments under the FTA. 

Despite this, our trade minister Todd McClay told The Bulletin he was comfortable that the legislation in its current form would not risk our international relations – and he was aware of the international commentary. “[I] am not concerned that government policy, including the Fast-track Approvals Bill, impacts the agreed terms of the UK trade deal relating to environmental standards or the Paris Agreement,” he said. “All of New Zealand’s trade agreements, including NZ-UK FTA, recognise New Zealand (and the UK’s) right to set its own environmental laws and policies.”

What happens now?

For now, the fast-track bill is moving steadily through the machine of government. It has been facing select committee scrutiny since last week and, as RNZ reported, early submissions were largely in opposition to the bill. Submissions resume at 9am today. At the end of this process, it will return to parliament for potential updates. Te Pāti Māori has questioned this process, however, pointing in a press release to the 550 slots available for those wishing to speak to the select committee despite 2,350 individual submitters – something co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer called a “lucky dip”. Meanwhile, Labour’s Arena Williams, writing for the Herald last week, went so far as to draw links between growing disillusionment with politicians and the fast-track bill. There’s also the question of what projects could eventuate if the law passes, with particular attention paid to Trans Tasman’s Taranaki seabed mining project after the company pulled out of its Environmental Projections Authority hearing last month. While the trio of ministers will have the power to make the call, other projects are expected to be listed directly in the legislation when it passes – that part of the bill remains empty. RNZ’s Farah Hancock wrote last month about the secrecy that has surrounded the bill throughout this lengthy and ongoing debate.

Z is partnering with Dave Letele to support our communities

Z is proud to support communities across Aotearoa New Zealand, through initiatives like Good in The Hood and their staff volunteering programme.

As part of Z’s commitment to community, Z is once again partnering with community advocate Dave Letele to encourage local charities and groups to get involved with Good in the Hood.

To learn more about the partnership and Good in the Hood, click here. (sponsored)

How neurodivergent children are slipping through the cracks

On the front page of this morning’s Herald, Derek Cheng looks at how the education system is failing neurodivergent children in New Zealand (paywalled). About 15 to 20% of all students are estimated to be neurodivergent, which includes those with autism, ADHD and dyslexia, but also acquired issues such as from a health condition, injury, drug use or trauma. According to a new report co-authored by Dr Nina Hood, an estimated two thirds of neurodivergent students are not getting state-funded support. “This is a sizeable proportion of students in our education system. We’re talking big numbers here. The scale of the problem is enormous,” Hood says. There’ll be more on this report across the day, including on RNZ’s Nine to Noon later this morning.

Sunday airs its final show, but TVNZ found to have breached collective agreement

TVNZ’s Sunday came to a close last night, airing its final episode following staff cuts at the state broadcaster. Host Miriama Kamo described her emotions after filming the final show. "Coming out and seeing everybody clapping just undid me," Kamo said. "It was a moment where you think, oh that's right, we've been a huge family for a long time, it was gorgeous." If you missed the episode, which included an investigation into the 2021 murder of Auckland woman Lena Zhang Harrap, you can find it here. The programme’s final show came just 48 hours after the Employment Relations Authority ruled that TVNZ had breached its collective agreement with the E Tū union. Negotiator Michael Wood spoke to RNZ’s Checkpoint on Friday evening and was unable to say whether the ERA’s ruling could mean any changes to TVNZ’s decision to restructure and cut jobs.

Duncan Greive reflected on the end of Sunday, and the gap that it will leave in local journalism, earlier in the year, while I recapped some of the show’s most important stories.

Join The Spinoff Members

“With a publication like the Spinoff, you never know quite what excellent journalism you will find. Complement this with the literary wizardry covering all manner of cultural topics, and you are contributing to a very fine publication indeed.” Julie, Spinoff Member since 2019.

If, like Julie, you enjoy our journalism and want to support us, please consider becoming a member today.

Click and Collect

• It felt like everyone (except me) saw the aurora over the weekend. If you were also inside watching a movie as the sky lit up, Stuff has compiled some of the best pictures from around the country. It’ll give you some Monday water cooler chat.

• A fascinating interview with the prime minister from the Herald’s Audrey Young, focusing on foreign affairs and Aukus. For more on Aukus, The Spinoff’s Joel MacManus explains what it actually is.

• There was a new political poll on Friday, bringing good news for the coalition and bad news for the Greens.

• As it happened: The Eurovision Song Contest for 2024, via the BBC.

• Winston Peters wants to police what bathroom people use. And, sticking with Peters, there’s so far no update on the legal threat against him from Bob Carr.

• And if you missed it yesterday, The Sunday Essay on The Spinoff is always worth a read.

• The Spinoff is looking for a new staff writer – could it be you?

Right now on The Spinoff

Shanti Mathias questions whether you can really provide meals for teens for $3. Joel MacManus answers everything you wanted to know about Aukus but were too afraid to ask. Comedy legend Ginette McDonald on how Lyn of Tawa changed her life for this week’s My Life in TV. And Emily Writes honours the worst Mother’s Day marketing with the 2024 ‘Steve Awards’.

Thanks for reading. I’ll be back tomorrow, have a great start to you

Got some feedback about The Bulletin, or anything in the news? Get in touch with me at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz.

If you liked what you read today, share The Bulletin with friends, family and colleagues.