Privatisation fear sees opposition go on the attack

The PM didn't want to talk about it, but he had to. A lot.

Mōrena, and welcome to The Bulletin for Wednesday, January 29.

In today’s edition: An unruly first day back at the school of growth, what’s the deal with DeepSeek, and Kiribati government defends Winston Peters trip snub. But first, are asset sales back on the agenda?

(Toby Morris / The Spinoff)

Fuel on the privatisation fire

We touched briefly yesterday on the issue of privatisation or asset sales, but with parliament’s return yesterday there has been added attention and scrutiny on the idea. So, this morning we’re going to take a look at what’s actually been said, and what history tells us. While in opposition, Christopher Luxon pledged not to sell off any state owned assets as prime minister – in his first term, anyway. That promise remains, though there have been some signals the government could be exploring possible options for the future. Kiwibank, for example, is set to be bolstered via private investments ahead of a possible part sale, though the finance minister Nicola Willis classed this an “asset capitalisation”. Duncan Greive for The Spinoff looked at the case for selling some of the bank here.

The Herald has done substantial reporting on the seemingly softening stance on privatisation, with Thomas Coughlan reporting last July that “purpose statements” had been drawn up for each state owned enterprises, potentially to determine whether there was a valid reason for owning each asset.

Through all of this, the consistent line from the prime minister has been that nothing will happen before the 2026 election and National would campaign on any changes it wanted to make. Things have been inflamed, however, after Act’s David Seymour said in his state of the nation address last week that the government was “hopeless at owning things”. It’s only an Act-backed position at this stage, but in a coalition, everything gets pulled into the PM’s orbit regardless (Luxon told RNZ’s Morning Report yesterday he hadn’t actually watched or read Seymour’s speech in full).

Word of the day

The opposition has quickly pounced on all of this, arguing the government is softening us up for asset sales. Labour leader Chris Hipkins dedicated a significant chunk of his speech in the House yesterday to privatisation, as did Green co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick. Some variation on the word “privatisation” cropped up more than 40 times across the speeches responding to Christopher Luxon’s first speech in the house for 2025 (Luxon, unsurprisingly, did not mention the word once – though he did say “growth” 18 times). “That is what they've done for the last 40 years and that is exactly the playbook that we are seeing now: underfund public services, run them into the ground, cut them and hock them off – that is what this government wants to do,” said Hipkins. Speaking to reporters, he raised the possibility of the government privatising hospitals and bringing in a user-pays model, something National has said won’t happen.

Labour MP Willie Jackson said he wouldn’t be surprised if Māori took legal action against the sale of state assets, reported Maioha Panapa for Te Ao Māori News. “You’ve heard the angst, and we’ve had the terrible experience of what happens in terms of privatisation,” he said.

Coalition fautlines

Despite the political mud-flinging, widespread asset sales are unlikely to be on the agenda come 2026. However, Stuff’s Glenn McConnell has looked at what could be sold off. The most likely contender, and one raised by David Seymour in his speech last week, was QV – the state-owned property valuation entity. “It’s pretty hard to see why the government would want to be in the property valuation business,” Seymour said yesterday. State house numbers could also be adjusted, while the Taxpayers’ Union, in an email yesterday, reiterated its view that TVNZ should be sold.

When Seymour said that New Zealanders were “squeamish” about discussing asset sales, he could very easily have been referring to his coalition partner, National. As the Herald’s Jamie Ensor analysed (paywalled), Seymour has put the subject squarely on the agenda whether the prime minister wants to talk about it or not. “You’re having a conversation that is not happening this term. I don’t know how to be any clearer with you about it,” Luxon told reporters yesterday. It also pits Seymour against Winston Peters, who remains staunchly opposed to asset sales. "I spent my whole career ensuring that our assets stay in our possession,” the NZ First leader told reporters.

Do we know whether it’s popular?

Luxon told reporters yesterday that his party was open to having that conversation in the longer term and, should it decide it wanted to sell any assets, it would campaign on it next year. That has echoes of the last National-led government, wrote The Post’s Thomas Manch, when John Key took asset sales to the 2011 election. Despite a citizens-initiated referendum revealing a resoundingly negative view of the idea, Key argued the election victory had given him a mandate and went about partially privatise the government energy firms, and selling more of Air New Zealand.

It’s hard to know how popular the idea is in 2025. Writing for The Conversation, Massey University politics professor Richard Shaw said that the 2020 New Zealand Election Study showed just under 50% of those surveyed “somewhat” or “strongly” agreed with the proposition that “privatisation has gone too far”. In other words, he wrote, “those who oppose state asset sales comfortably outnumber those who support them”. Whether Luxon, Seymour or Peters can win the debate will be a question for further down the track.

Have thoughts? Join the conversation in the comments.

Can we do capitalism better? This new Auckland hub is up for the challenge

Juncture, a new centre at the University of Auckland Business School, is taking on one of the most urgent questions of our time. Can we do capitalism better? We talk to the Business School leaders behind the centre to understand how they're digging into this vast and important question. Read the full story here. (sponsored)

An unruly first day back at the school of growth

There was too much going on in parliament yesterday to cover it at the top of today’s Bulletin. Thankfully, The Spinoff’s Lyric Waiwiri-Smith has captured the first session in the House for the first edition of a new twice-weekly column, Echo Chamber. Yesterday saw PM Christopher Luxon deliver the prime minister’s statement, the traditional opener of the first day of each year.

His speech was, of course, all about growth and saying yes and going, going, going until you’ve gone so far you’ve reached peak economic health, a brand new Resource Management Act and hopefully an Eras Tour (“not an E-R-R-O-R-S Tour,” Luxon quipped to Hipkins). Whatever he had to say had already been scanned and highlighted for quotables by the press gallery (Winston Peters had a printout at his seat and had highlighted the entire thing), but the public gallery may have had a harder time hearing anything at all.

More reading:

• The Yeah-Nah Parliament of 2025 (Newsroom)

• Parliament has “beginning of the year” energy (The Post)

Help keep The Spinoff ticking

Last year we published an open letter outlining our current reality.

We revealed that only 2% of our audience support us financially and shared the real need to double the number of members who support us with monthly or annual payments.

We still have a way to go, but the support has made us as determined as ever to get there. Please continue to spread the word and share the letter.

If you haven't yet, please become a member or donate today.

The questions DeepSeek doesn’t want to answer

You probably hadn’t heard of DeepSeek until Monday. The new Chinese AI company has become global news after it topped app stores around the world and, explained the BBC, sunk some tech stocks along the way. But as Stuff’s Paula Penfold reported in excruciating detail yesterday, there are concerns the new app could be censored by the Chinese government. Penfold, going on a “date with DeepSeek”, asked the app for responses on subjects like Tiananmen Square and alleged human rights abuses and gets some intriguing answers.

More reading:

• The day DeepSeek turned tech and Wall Street upside down (Washington Post via BusinessDesk, paywalled)

• Experts urge caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek (The Guardian)

• We asked DeepSeek and ChatGPT the same questions. Here are their answers (Sydney Morning Herald)

Join us live in 2025

We have four fantastic live events in 2025. Join us in Auckland and Wellington for The Spinoff Live!

Auckland at Q Theatre: Bryn & Ku’s Singles Club Party, February 13 and Gone by Lunchtime Live, April 9.

Wellington at the Hannah Playhouse: The Fold Live, February 20 and The Spinoff Book Club, March 13.

Listen: NZME pivots to video in 2025 and the problem with TVNZ's cricket hit

Glen Kyne returns to The Fold to discuss the first big media news story of the year – NZME's decision to trade some senior text journalists for a sharp increase in video production. Next we discuss the shocking impact of Chinese-AI lab DeepSeek's world-beating LLM performance on a shoestring budget, Acast's big Between Two Beers podcast pickup and finally how a big success for TVNZ reveals a deeper challenge of video in a digital context.

To support work like this, consider becoming a Spinoff Member.

Click and Collect

• Kiribati government defends Winston Peters trip snub, but the deputy PM isn’t buying it.

• Experts, political figures consider Treaty principles debate beyond bill.

• Golriz Ghahraman critical of police’s “weird” pursuit of Pak’nSave alleged shoplifting incident.

• Poll shows support for extending parliamentary term to four years.

• Interislander ferry plan cost $1m before Peters took hold.

• Government announces roads where speed limit reductions will be reversed.

Right now on The Spinoff

Shanti Mathias explores what's next for food scraps collection. Here's what critics are saying about the Jacinda Ardern film that just premiered at Sundance. Alex Casey impatiently wonders what happened with ThreeNow and the Traitors UK finale, and petitions for actor Sam Neill to get his own lifestyle show immediately. For The Cost of Being, a “responsible and consistent” 23-year-old working in PR explains their indulgence in Jazz apple juice.

That’s it for this morning, thanks for reading. Catch you back here tomorrow.

Want to get in touch? Join the conversation in the Substack comments section below or via email at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz if you have any feedback on today’s top stories (or anything else in the news).

If you liked what you read today, share The Bulletin with friends, family and colleagues.