Luxon didn't meet the hīkoi, but he won't be able to hide from what comes next
An undeniable show of opposition to the coalition painted the streets of Wellington red, white and black.
Mōrena, and welcome to The Bulletin for Wednesday, November 20.
In today’s edition: The government’s gang patch ban will come into effect tonight, is concrete the future of our roading network, and a look ahead to next week’s official cash rate decision. But first: possibly the country’s largest ever protest marched on the parliament yesterday in a sea of red, white and black.
‘A Māori nation has been born’
They came in their thousands. Then a few more thousand more. And a couple of extra thousand to boot. The conservative estimate, provided by police yesterday evening, was that 42,000 people marched to parliament yesterday as part of the nationwide Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti. The Spinoff’s Joel MacManus, who was among the crowd, reported that the hīkoi was likely New Zealand’s largest ever protest. “But even if we could work out the exact number, it’s hard to express what that means on the ground. A crowd of 50,000 at Eden Park is incomparable to a crowd of the same size marching towards parliament.”
Whatever the final tally, it’s undeniable that the message was heard loud and clear (indeed, around the world). Stuff’s Glenn McConnell has written an illustrative report on how the day played out, writing that by the time the protest arrived at parliament it trailed back 1.8km to Te Aro park, with some attendees even riding horses at the tail end. Joel Maxwell, also for Stuff, embedded himself in the march and spoke to some of the tens of thousands that attended.
Ostensibly directed at the controversial Treaty Principles Bill, the hīkoi was ultimately about something far greater and less instantly definable. Mana whenua leader Helmut Modlik, reported Newsroom, told the assembled crowd that yesterday marked the “beginning of the end of unchecked rule over Māori by kawanatanga [government].” The hīkoi organiser, Eru Kapi-Kingi, simply said: “Today, a Māori nation has been born.”
Facing the hīkoi
MPs from across the spectrum either spoke to the crowd or were seen listening, reported Newsroom’s Laura Walters. Some, like Chris Hipkins, spent a considerable amount of time facing the hīkoi. Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, who has become a global symbol in the wake of her performance in parliament last week, addressed the crowd directly. “This march is about us, walking, marching, side by side, generation by generation. This bill divides us as a country; the Treaty unites us, all ages, all races,” the MP said, reported Te Ao Māori News.
Others, like Act leader David Seymour, the man behind the Treaty Principles Bill, made only brief appearances. He led his entire caucus out onto the forecourt of parliament, using the opportunity to film a video for his social media.
Speaking to RNZ’s Checkpoint, Seymour said he did not consider the hīkoi to be”representative” of all New Zealand. When questioned over whether he considered the protesters to be “misinformed”, Seymour denied this but added that some had been given “bad information” on his proposed law. "For example, I saw someone this morning saying that they didn't want to have the Treaty changed. Well, my bill doesn't do that.” (What it does do, in case you are still wondering, is strictly define the principles as included in legislation – Māori legal scholar Carwyn Jones recently argued for The Spinoff that the principles are already clearly known and defined).
Those who did face the crowd were greeted by a sea of colourful flags and placards. The Spinoff’s Lyric Waiwiri-Smith has helpfully compiled some of the best.
Where was Luxon?
One person who did not front to the protesters was prime minister Christopher Luxon. While it is Seymour’s bill, many see Luxon’s decision to permit it to be introduced as part of a coalition agreement to be a sign of culpability. More broadly, as the Herald’s Audrey Young argued recently (paywalled), the Luxon-led government agreed to a raft of Māori-related policies “on a scale not seen in any previous coalition agreements”. In short, Act policy or not, the buck stops with the PM. So where was he yesterday? Inside the Beehive, mere metres away from the crowd. “I was open to [meeting hīkoi organisers],” Luxon told reporters. “But the reality frankly is that many of them are Te Pāti Māori affiliated."
In analysis for ThreeNews, Jenna Lynch said that the PM won’t be able to hide away for the rest of the debate over the Treaty Principles Bill. “This will still be going on at the start of the year and the political calendar is traditionally kicked off with a number of Māori events. That is a problem for Christopher Luxon not to have it voted down by then, not to have it neutered.”
Luxon has repeatedly reiterated the bill will not make it past first reading. It’s practically impossible to see him breaking his word now. As The Spinoff’s Toby Manhire analyses this morning, his language has evolved dramatically since talk of a bill or treaty referendum was first floated.
What now?
Writing for The Post, Luke Malpass argued that the scale of the protest means it cannot simply be ignored by those inside the Beehive. It will likely benefit both Te Pāti Māori and Act, on the conflicting side of the debate, in the short term, but Malpass rightly questioned what it will mean on a bigger scale. “It is very difficult to tell just where the politics of it all will land once the bill is voted down. Will it hang round National’s neck or will it simply fade into the background 18 months out from an election?” NZ First minister Shane Jones, reported Politik’s Richard Harman (paywalled), believed yesterday’s demonstration went well beyond opposition to a single piece of legislation but instead tapped into “a sense of anxiety within Māoridom that their rights, their identity, are being imperilled”. As Harman wrote, many of the crowd were young and several of those who addressed the crowd noted this. Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi called on young people to enrol on the Māori roll.
Yesterday also coincided with the start of public submissions on the bill, with the justice select committee laying out criteria for those planning to share their thoughts. As Stuff reported, that includes a no swearing rule. Meanwhile, the aftermath of the haka that was felt around the world could see parliamentary rules changed. The Herald’s Thomas Coughlan has written an interesting opinion piece looking at the balance between breaking the rules and the benefits that can be gained from it.
Support longform journalism in New Zealand at The Spinoff
Joel MacManus's longform investigation into the urgent race to solve homelessness in Aotearoa is the kind of vital journalism we can only do with support from Spinoff members and donors. If it matters to you, and you're able to, please donate or become a member today.
Gang patch ban to come into effect tonight
From midnight, it will be prohibited to display any gang insignia in public as part of a government-mandated crackdown. All three coalition parties campaigned on so-called “tough on crime” policies. The new rules were about stopping “fear and intimidation”, assistant police commissioner Paul Basham said. But one gang expert, reports The Post’s Michael Wright, thinks the new rules will do little to stop gangs from finding workarounds. “I feel quite certain we will see substitution. This may mean greater use of tattoos (not covered under the new law) which would obviously be very negative,” he said. There were also shorthand references that gangs could employ, he said, citing the number 88 which was synonymous with the Head Hunters.
In an opinion piece published by the Herald today, police minister Mark Mitchell said that for many years, police have been losing to organised crime groups. “Gang members in New Zealand should understand that they don’t get to pick and choose which laws they comply with. They’re not above the law. Gang members, especially those with families should show the courage to leave the gangs and rejoin society in a positive way.”
Should we be building more roads out of concrete?
The government intends to go on a road construction blitz over the rest of its term in power, with 17 roads of national significance in the pipeline along with regional projects as well. Now, reports Oliver Lewis for BusinessDesk (paywalled), a report commissioned by industry group Concrete NZ makes the case for building roads out of concrete instead of asphalt. According to the report, while concrete roads would be more expensive in the short term, lifetime savings on average could amount to 17%. It could also be more sustainable, as it can absorb carbon over its lifetime, and fuel efficient due to its rigidity.
Approximately one in two highways in the United States were built using concrete, said Concrete NZ chief executive Rob Gaimster. “Concrete roads are best used in applications where there are high traffic densities and areas of high stresses from heavy vehicles,” he said. “We can see a number of stretches of road where concrete would save money and time, such as Auckland’s Port Motorway, the Cambridge section of the Waikato Expressway to the intersection of SH1 and SH29 at Piarere and SH1, north of Levin.”
Have you subscribed to The Weekend?
For your weekly wrap of the best and most read Spinoff content, along with some hidden gems, subscribe to The Weekend with Madeleine Chapman. You’ll get a special column written by the editor along with a handpicked selection of Spinoff reads perfect for weekend reading, delivered every Saturday morning.
Click and Collect
Thirty-six mining projects got initial tick for fast-tracking in a single, three-hour meeting.
In his third attempt at constraining the drafting of new laws and regulations, David Seymour is seizing the controls and handing them to a board that he’ll appoint.
Foodstuffs North Island Limited and Foodstuffs South Island Limited say they will appeal the Commerce Commission's decision to decline clearance for the two to become a single national grocery entity.
For BusinessDesk subscribers, a look ahead to next week’s official cash rate decision and why economists have firmed up their view that another large cut is necessary. (paywalled)
New Zealand households are finding it hard to believe the inflation monster has been beaten, according to a new economic survey.
Alex Casey asks whether Netflix has forgotten about New Zealand. A handwriting expert tells me what the signatures of our politicians says about their personalities. Duncan Greive reviews Camping, the hyper horny, extremely silly play we need right now. For the Cost of Being: An “anti-capitalist” barista and tutor renting in Wellington.
That’s it for today. Thanks for reading and see you back here tomorrow morning.
Want to get in touch? Join the conversation in the Substack comments section below or via email at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz if you have any feedback on today’s top stories (or anything else in the news).
If you liked what you read today, share The Bulletin with friends, family and colleagues.
Perhaps a Nuremburg rally in front of parliament with Mr Seymour speaking to a larger crowd would indicate some support, but I can't see it happening anytime soon. The desperate 'supported by the majority' rhetoric is more likely coming from Russian propaganda bots.
Most New Zealanders support the Treaty Principles Bill. Be a reporter and report on this. Where is your journalistic integrity?