Debate about reality of health inequities shocked back to life
The surgical prioritisation score at the centre of a story yesterday was introduced in February and there is evidence it is helping to eliminate inequities
In today’s edition: government walks back early childhood funding requirement; prime minister advised Meng Foon email was a resignation letter; inquiry into New Zealand’s banking sector picked to be announced today; but first, ethnicity criteria for elective surgeries was rolled out in 2020 and the tool at the centre of a front page story was fully implemented in February this year
Surgical prioritisation using ethnicity criteria first rolled out in 2020
In June 2020, the Herald published a “Big Read” from Nicholas Jones (paywalled) on a plan from DHBs to prioritise Māori and Pacific patients for certain elective surgeries. It opened with the story of Paumea Ferris who discovered he had a 68mm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) only because he had a free check that was being offered to Māori aged 55-74. Subsequent reporting on the surgical prioritisation plans followed Jones’ report. Both the Act and National parties voiced opposition with Act leader David Seymour saying the plan risked “fuelling an election campaign of racial bickering”. As we got further into the Covid pandemic, inequities present within the health system became something of a regular news beat as criticism of the government’s approach to the vaccination rollout grew. Most of us took an interest in its success and were, at the very least, accepting of the fact that a one-size-fits-all approach wasn't going to work and that the different approaches required were explicitly framed based on needs determined by ethnicity. We all know what happened at the 2020 election but I’m not sure we would characterise it as one dominated by “racial bickering”.
Rollout of prioritisation tool completed in February
Flash forward to yesterday, and the issue of explicitly addressing surgical healthcare needs based on ethnicity was back in the news after a report from Jason Walls and Barry Soper in the Herald. Just a quick correction on this story as it appeared in The Bulletin yesterday here: Walls and Soper are both with NZME-owned radio station Newstalk ZB and not the Herald and Newshub as stated. The story relates to the addition of ethnicity as one of five criteria used to determine patient waitlist prioritisation. The rollout of the tool, the equity adjustor score, was completed in Auckland in February and as BusinessDesk’s Tamara Poi-Ngawhika reports, due to “positive evidence that it is helping to eliminate inequities in our system, it is now being rolled out across the other northern region districts.”
Royal Australasian College of Surgeons supports the new tool
As Newsroom’s Jo Moir writes (paywalled), evidenced by Jones’ reporting in 2020, the concept of adding ethnicity to this mix is not new. Māori and Pasifika people are less likely to be referred or accepted for treatment in the first place, and once in the system generally get less treatment. That was exacerbated by Covid which is why DHBs looked at the criteria in 2020. The new tool is a refinement of the original criteria which were deemed too blunt by clinicians. Speaking on behalf of the team that developed the algorithm for a new equity adjustor score, Duncan Bliss told Newsroom he can't stress enough that clinical need “always takes precedence and the equity adjustor doesn’t interfere with that”. The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons supports the equity adjustor score with Associate Professor Andrew MacCormick saying “It’s not a zero-sum game. Elevating those groups that have been less well-served by the health system is a benefit to everyone. It means improved health across the population and the targeting of healthcare to those individuals who need it most.” Dr Vanessa Blair of the Association of General Surgeons said the tool is “a little bit simplistic for what is a very complex problem with many underlying contributing factors."
Is it less controversial if we use life expectancy as the criteria?
Jo Moir posed an interesting question at the post-cabinet press conference yesterday asking whether it might be better for this criteria to be framed around life expectancy disparities because people get “triggered” when you talk about race. Based on some of the comments sections I read yesterday, she might have a point, but you're still just sugar-coating a reality we seemed a little more comfortable accepting when vaccination targets were tied to alert-level step-downs. It’s an interesting hypothetical though. If we said the deaths of half of one group of people were potentially avoidable, compared to 23% in the rest of the population, would that be less controversial? That’s a finding from a Waitemata District Health Board study in 2019. A New Zealand Medical Journal editorial deemed the findings so alarming, it said should be on the computer screensavers of any planning staff working in health organisations. Madeleine Chapman cuts to chase on life expectancy with a bleak ranking of ethnicities in New Zealand, based on how likely they are to die first.
How to make your fuel go the distance
With the 25 cents-per-litre fuel excise duty coming back to the pump on June 30, almost 30 cents per litre will be added to our fuel bills from that date.
But with driving the only practical option for many people around the country, how can we make sure our fuel costs are staying as low as possible?
From changing how to changing when you drive, we've asked some experts about how to keep the petrol bill down. Read more on The Spinoff now.
Sponsored by Z Energy.
Government walks back early childhood funding requirement
One of the key initiatives in this year’s budget was $1.6b in additional funding for the 20-hours-free early childhood care scheme. Requirements of the additional funding included that the scheme be expanded to include two-year-olds and that early childhood centres accept children whose parents only wanted to enrol them for the free 20 hours. Early childhood centres responded by saying the requirement would have made it hard to remain in business. The centres said they made money to operate from charging for hours that children attended above the 20-hours-free scheme. Prime minister Chris Hipkins announced yesterday that the government was walking back the requirement that centres accept children whose parents wanted them there for the 20 free hours after consultation with the ECE sector. Hipkins also announced a 7.7% increase in the amount received for paid parental leave from July 1.
Prime minister advised Meng Foon email was a resignation letter
Early yesterday afternoon, even Meng Foon wasn’t sure if he’d resigned as race relations commissioner. According to Foon, he emailed the prime minister on Friday morning to let him know he intended to resign on Sunday due to a perceived conflict of interest. Confusion arose as to whether or not that email qualified as his resignation at the time, with the government announcing it on Friday afternoon. Yesterday at the post-cabinet press conference, prime minister Chris Hipkins read the email out loud. It said: “I am resigning as the Race Relations Commissioner as I didn't declare the amount of money MY Gold Investments was receiving from MSD. I'll resign Sunday.” Hipkins said he had been advised, “that it was a resignation letter and the government was correct to accept it as a resignation letter.” Foon has also said he did declare his interest in an emergency housing provider when he became commissioner in 2019 and provided RNZ with documentation to back up his claims. A Human Rights Commission spokesperson said the document was from June 7, and the first time that specific income had been noted on the register was late April this year.
Our members make the difference
The support of our members ensures we can continue to employ and commission diverse voices covering stories from a range of perspectives and make them freely available to all. From Spinoff stalwarts Toby Manhire and Alex Casey to emerging talents like Charlotte Muru-Lanning and Shanti Mathias, our journalists, and contributors do valuable work that is only possible with the support of readers like you. If you can, support the team and donate today.
Banking sector market study picked to be announced today
As the Herald’s Raphael Franks and Sam Hurley report, an inquiry into New Zealand’s banking sector is slated to be announced today, with a focus on profits and fees. The government is expected to task the Commerce Commission with a market study into the sector. It follows calls for some form of inquiry from the National party, the Green party, and the Reserve Bank. As Franks and Hurley report, Labour MPs turned down a suggestion from National finance spokesperson Nicola Willis that an inquiry be done by parliament’s finance and expenditure committee, claiming a Commerce Commission market study was likely.
Click and Collect
Prime minister Chris Hipkins will meet with China’s president Xi Jinping in Beijing next week
The options to reform the Emissions Trading Scheme
Benefits of reducing the speed limit in Wellington overstated by more than $250m
A new money personality quiz has dropped. My excellent budget spreadsheet skills didn’t swing the quiz as much as I thought they would and apparently I “enjoy the finer things in life”.
Every dog has his day and yesterday it was Huxley’s as he took an unplanned cruise in Auckland’s Hobson Bay
Got some feedback about The Bulletin, or anything in the news? Get in touch with me at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz.
If you liked what you read today, share The Bulletin with friends, family, and colleagues.
Shanti Mathias documents her quest to lead a fulfilling life confined to a single arterial road in Auckland. Madeleine Chapman hereby declares the 2023 election season open. Rachel Judkins meets a volunteer who helps terminally ill people tell their life stories. Tara Ward picks through some of the wildest things that have happened on Outlander as a new season of the show begins.
Sporting snippets
Over on
, Dylan Cleaver shares his thoughts on the All Blacks squad namingFifa launches tools to help teams handle abuse on social media ahead of the Women’s World Cup. Honestly, this is bleak news, but who am I to suggest that it’s not compulsory to be hideous online?
Thank you for publishing a fair comment regarding the priority to be given to certain groups. I was sickened by the filthy hatred spewed forth on social media regarding this. I doubt if most of those disparaging it had read the article explains the reasoning. Thank you again, I feel I can keep breathing easily now as I await my 97 th birthday in July. Please keep being honest.Maybe one day those of every race will get a chance to live long lives, not just those with white skins like me.
Extremely rich of David Seymour to talk about fuelling racial bickering, as it seems like that’s his main pastime 🙄