The Mike King backlash has quickly turned political. Will it change anything?

The mental health advocate is standing alone with his claim that 'alcohol is the solution for people with mental health issues'.

Mōrena, and welcome to The Bulletin for Friday, November 1.

In today’s edition: The auditor-general will launch an inquiry into fast-track conflicts of interest, Nicola Willis is refusing to say what advice she has on Cook Strait ferry replacements, and the Act Party is angry after a Te Pāti Māori MP Tākuta Ferris was heard calling something “fucking racist” in select committee. But first, Mike King’s comments about alcohol have been denounced, but will anything more come from the backlash?

Mike King (Image: Getty Images)

‘Alcohol is the solution’

Yesterday we talked about some developments in the mental health space and our troublingly high and unmoving suicide statistics. Today, we’re going to look at another issue in the same area.

On Wednesday night, comedian and mental health advocate Mike King appeared on Newstalk ZB with Heather du Plessis-Allan to discuss a decision (unrelated to his work) to reject an alcohol license application for a charity fashion show intended to raise funds for suicide prevention and mental health awareness. Du Plessis-Allan was clearly perplexed by the decision, but it was the comments by King, the founder of Gumboot Friday and recipient of $24m in government funding, that made numerous headlines. “Alcohol is the solution for people with mental health issues,” King said. “I would suggest to you that alcohol has prevented more young people from taking their own lives than it actually makes them take their own lives.”

That interview flew somewhat under the radar until yesterday when King, questioned by the NZ Herald, not only defended his remarks but doubled down. The increased risk of suicide from alcohol consumption was a matter of opinion, he said. Mental health minister Matt Doocey denounced the comments, though defended his government’s decision to fund King’s charity to the tune of $24m.

Outrage turns political

The response to King’s defense has been rapid. In a scathing opinion piece for The Spinoff yesterday, Madeleine Chapman said it was the “latest in a long, long string of comments King has made that call into question his ability to be a leader in mental health and advocacy”, questioning how he ended up in the position of a seemingly untouchable public figure.

On the latest episode of The Spinoff’s politics podcast, Gone by Lunchtime, co-host Anabelle Lee-Mather recalled a speech she watched King give to a group of school students about five years ago. “He gave the most extraordinary, incredible kōrero to those kids. And one of the things that he really stressed was how destructive alcohol is when it comes to our mental health,” said Lee-Mather. “For someone who does have this extraordinary funding situation where he's essentially got like an IV line of funding into his organisation, where you don't have to jump through any loops, it's just really surprising and a little bit concerning to hear that.”

As noted by Heather du Plessis-Allan in an opinion piece yesterday, the response to King’s comments has quickly turned political. Labour’s mental health spokesperson, Ingrid Leary, called for the government to pause and review its funding support for Gumboot Friday, reported Stuff. (The auditor general has already criticised the way King’s charity was funded). Leary said that King’s views were problematic, but also “a sad indictment of the government’s poor funding decision”.

Expect the prime minister to be questioned on this while he fronts to reporters later this morning.

Potentially dangerous ‘misinformation’

King’s comments are not just unfounded but potentially dangerous, and one Otago University expert went so far as to label it “misinformation”. King appeared to be suggesting that, as an alcoholic, he had used alcohol to mute other mental health issues – and while that may be the case, the evidence clearly shows it can exacerbate them. In a briefing published yesterday, health researchers said there was a “well-established body of research… that clearly links alcohol use with poor mental health outcomes and increased suicide risk” and that King’s views were the opposite of what the evidence showed.

A government inquiry into mental health and addiction noted a number of direct links between alcohol and harm, including evidence that it played a role in at least half of youth suicides and one-third of recorded offences. In 2017, the PM’s former chief science advisor Peter Gluckman cited “higher use of drugs and alcohol” as one contributing factor in our youth suicide rate.

In an interview with RNZ’s Checkpoint, Drug Foundation executive director Sarah Helm said King's comments were “unhelpful” and risked damaging “the hard work of many people over successive decades to try and build awareness around mental health and suicide prevention”. Given the tidal wave of criticism, it will be interesting to see how the government chooses to defend its support of King, especially in light of stories such as this from rural mental health worker Anna Sophia on The Spinoff yesterday.

Mental health callouts to cease

King’s comments are particularly poorly timed given this month will also see police scale back their response to mental health-related call outs, as explained here by Stuff’s Bridie Witton. Outgoing police commissioner Andrew Coster said that while police will still attend “any jobs where there is an immediate risk to life or safety”, other calls will be directed to “more appropriate” services. In the year to May, mental health callouts made up 11% of all 111 calls but only 5% of these had a criminal element.

The theory behind why police are pulling back from mental health callouts is easy to understand: you would expect police to focus on their core role of preventing and responding to crime. However, there are concerns that it could instead pile additional pressure onto our already stretched mental health system and see people fall through the cracks.

Documents leaked to ThreeNews reporter Jenna Lynch reveal that Health NZ is yet to finalise how it will respond to the additional mental health callouts, with Labour saying "people’s lives will be at risk” if they were not done properly. In comments to NZ Doctor (paywalled), psychiatrist David Codyre said the police aren’t often the best equipped to handle mental health situations they find themselves in. That was the view echoed by the University of Waikato’s Sarah Gordon, who told the Science Media Centre that the involvement of police can actively harm people in need. “Relying on police as first responders for mental health related events can lead to inappropriate treatment,” she said.

However, there still needs to be something to fill the gap. In a Q&A published by Newsroom today, mental health specialist Paul Skirrow called the work done by police “invaluable” as there was “no real alternative being put in its place”. In comments to the Science Media Centre, AUT’s Antje Deckert also worried about the impact on already short-staffed health workers being forced to take on additional cases. “While reducing police callouts to people in a mental health crisis might work in favour of both police officers and the people in crisis, the subsequent intervention gap needs to be filled with an appropriate response. If the gap remains unfilled, we risk people not receiving the care they require and the worsening of our suicide statistics.”

Join our community of supporters

"I like that it feels like chipping in for a good cause, rather than paying for a subscription." – Kimberley, Spinoff member.

Whether you read, listen to or watch our mahi, you can support us to do more by donating today or signing up to become a member. Already a member? Ka nui te mihi, your support means the world to us.

Auditor-general to probe fast-track conflicts of interest

How possible conflicts of interest were handled by the ministers overseeing the controversial fast-track legislation will be probed by the auditor-general, reported RNZ’s Craig McCulloch. The forthcoming bill includes details of 149 projects that were hand picked from a pool of applicants. It includes housing builds, the redevelopment of Auckland’s Eden Park and nearly a dozen mining projects. But the bill also noted where conflicts had arisen in the select of the projects – eight for regional development minister Shane Jones and one for infrastructure minister Chris Bishop.

Auditor-general John Ryan said that, in order to maintain confidence and given the amount of public interest, he would investigate whether "appropriate systems and processes" were in place to ensure ministers promptly identified all conflicts and took sufficient steps to manage them. "This is especially so when decisions are being made at the highest level of government (that is, by ministers), or in relation to significant decisions about how public resources are used.”

In response, Labour said the government should consider the outcome of the inquiry before deciding whether to push ahead with the fast-track bill, reported the Herald’s Jamie Ensor. “The 149 companies who have projects on the fast track list get an enormous advantage by not having to comply with current laws that protect the environment,” said environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking. “The public must have confidence the decision to put projects on the list was not made because a minister had a vested interest in it.”

Listen: Payments above and beyond

Fintechs are changing the way we spend and save, but they are also set to change the way we could be paid for work, or more correctly, how workers are paid benefits on the fringes. On today’s episode of When the Facts Change, host Bernard Hickey talks to Steven Zinsli, the founder of Extraordinary (formerly HealthNow) about his new payments card system to help employers deliver extra benefits to employees through electronic cards, rather than having to claim expenses or just get plain old cash paid straight into a bank account.

You can find When the Facts Change below, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Click and Collect

• Despite decades of legal clarity, David Seymour and Shane Jones are claiming the Treaty principles are ambiguous in order to justify their push to undermine them, argues Māori legal scholar Carwyn Jones.

• The Act Party has raised concerns with the Speaker of the House after Te Pāti Māori MP Tākuta Ferris was heard saying “fucking racist” following a submission at a parliamentary select committee.

• Aratere crew “unaware” of override as ferry headed towards grounding. Meanwhile, reports The Post, finance minister Nicola Willis is refusing to say what advice she has on Cook Strait ferry replacements.

• “Patchy” improvements to safe staffing levels risk being undone amid Health NZ’s financial problems, the nurses’ union is warning.

• The Ministry of Health has dedicated just one tenth of a full-time equivalent employee to Long Covid, reports Marc Daalder at Newsroom. Meanwhile, if you missed this piece on The Spinoff by Rohan Botica looking at the lack of action on Long Covid, it’s worth a read.

• Last Christmas: Smith and Caughey’s gets ready for its annual Christmas display as the store prepares to significantly downsize.

Right now on The Spinoff

Anna Rawhiti-Connell wonders what makes it so hard to dine outside. Preyanka Gothanayagi reviews Wellington's Diwali festival, the best party in town. Peter Janssen introduces some of New Zealand's most haunted pubs. Lyric Waiwiri-Smith reviews the Travis Scott concert. For Hallowe'en, a group of writers reflect on the scariest movie they've ever seen. Toby Manhire chronicles the 21 painful stages of a free-speech firestorm. Hera Lindsay Bird advises a reader who thought they were a lesbian, until they developed a crush on a cis man.

That’s it for another week, thanks for reading. I’ll see you back here on Monday morning.

Want to get in touch? Join the conversation in the Substack comments section below or via email at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz if you have any feedback on today’s top stories (or anything else in the news).

If you liked what you read today, share The Bulletin with friends, family and colleagues.